🤖 AI benchmark: hit-rate of 7 models

Prematch Ao vivo (in-play)

Seven external AI models (Hermes contour) independently analyze the same jogos — predicting the resultado (1X2), total (Mais de/Menos de), both equipes to placar (BTTS) and the exact placar. Here we honestly compare their palpites against the real result after the final whistle and combine everything into a single accuracy rating. An informational and analytical snapshot, not betting advice.

⚠️ Data is still accumulating — counting starts from 09.07.2026, so all models are compared on the same events (early test palpites are excluded). The sample is still small and not representative. Right now the snapshot holds 11 jogo(es), 21 settled AI palpites (Hockey). The figures below are N, not «a percentage you can trust»: the more jogos are played out, the more reliable the snapshot becomes. We show it transparently from day one, not only once the sample becomes «convenient».

Leaderboard · Hockey

Model N (settled) 1X2 Dupla chance (1X) Total gols BTTS Exact placar Composite accuracy
Google AI
11 81.8%(9/11) 81.8%(9/11) 54.5%(6/11) 72.7%(8/11) 0.0%(0/11) 52.3%(23/44)
Claude
10 60.0%(6/10) 60.0%(6/10) 60.0%(6/10) 70.0%(7/10) 0.0%(0/10) 47.5%(19/40)
DeepSeek
0
ChatGPT
0
Qwen
0
Kimi
0
GLM 5.2
0

grey — sample <5, not representative; «—» — the model has not made a settled palpite yet.

Dupla chance (1X) — the same escolha counts as a vitória if the chosen side won or the jogo drew. Of the 1X2 losses in football/hockey: 0 draws, 6 underdog (total settled 1X2 escolhas in these sports: 21, double chance combined 71.4% (15/21)). The models almost always take the favorite and don't bet on a empate — double chance shows how many bets are eaten specifically by draws.

Composite accuracy — the share of correct palpites em all exibido mercados together: (sum of correct escolhas) ÷ (sum of all settled escolhas) em the mercados 1X2 + Total gols + BTTS + Exact placar. Each mercado-escolha weighs equally. This is hit-rate, not profitability — for money/ROI by model see /ai-agent. Total: a push (placar exactly na linha) is excluded from the denominator. BTTS is checked against whether both equipes scored. «Exact placar» — the full final placar was guessed correctly (H and A matched); palpites with no recognized placar do not count toward the denominator. Dupla chance (1X): a escolha counts as a vitória if the chosen side won OR it was a empate — it accounts for frequent draws that «eat» bets on the favorite. This metric is informational and is not included in composite accuracy.

Composite model rating · all mercados · Hockey

Bar height = the model's composite accuracy em all applicable mercados on the current sample. Sorted from best to worst.

52.3% (23/44)
Gemini 3.5 Flash
47.5% (19/40)
Opus 4.8
DeepSeek V4 Pro
sem dados
GPT 5.5
sem dados
Qwen 3.7 Plus
sem dados
Kimi 2.6
sem dados
GLM 5.2
sem dados

Bars are AI models by version; grey/dimmed — sample <5, not representative. The snapshot is informational, not betting advice.

Accuracy by mercado · Hockey

Where each model is strong: one mini-bar per applicable mercado, with the percentage and (hits/sample).

Google AI Composite 52.3%
1X2
81.8% (9/11)
Total gols
54.5% (6/11)
BTTS
72.7% (8/11)
Exact placar
0.0% (0/11)
Claude Composite 47.5%
1X2
60.0% (6/10)
Total gols
60.0% (6/10)
BTTS
70.0% (7/10)
Exact placar
0.0% (0/10)
DeepSeek Composite —
1X2
Total gols
BTTS
Exact placar
ChatGPT Composite —
1X2
Total gols
BTTS
Exact placar
Qwen Composite —
1X2
Total gols
BTTS
Exact placar
Kimi Composite —
1X2
Total gols
BTTS
Exact placar
GLM 5.2 Composite —
1X2
Total gols
BTTS
Exact placar

The model's favorite by 1X2 = the max of P1/X/P2 in its probabilities; for sports without a empate (tennis, volleyball, etc.) the «X» option doesn't participate. grey — sample <5, not representative. Not betting advice.